Ebook Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better

So, all individuals that review Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better will seem like doing the important things on their own. It relies on exactly how the viewers gaze as well as think of this book. However, typically, it really includes the amazing ideas of the book reading. It will additionally give you the incredible systems of creative thinking. Certainly, it will certainly serve you better principle of excellences. It is why we constantly use you the most effective publication that can make your life better. Currently, feel the life to obtain the incredible ways of publication accomplishment.

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better

Ebook Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better

After so long time no see as well as discover an exceptional publication, currently we are coming. Using the exceptional books become our jobs on a daily basis. We will certainly share whatever concerning the generosity and also finest of the books. This is not only guides from this country. The over boarded book collections are additionally many to seek for. You will not should seek for various other places; this site is the most effective readied to discover all book collections.

This factor is among some factors that make lots of people mainly intend to read this book. It is also recommended with the better of just how the writer reveals the description, giving instances, and also picks the dictions. Every word as well as sentence that is included in load as a publication qualified Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better shows up in very boosting condition. This is not just for the reading material but additionally a god selection for analysis.

Associated with this scenario, you can really have the moment to take Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better as so as feasible. Be among the fantastic individuals who take this publication likewise for source. For guaranteeing you to get this publication, we will show how you can find and also get the soft file of it here. Simply follow the web link that we offer as well as you could straight discover and make bargain to get this book. This is only picked to get as well as save it in some tool that you bring almost everywhere or at home or workplace.

Well, when else will certainly you discover this prospect to get this publication Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better soft file? This is your good chance to be right here and get this great publication Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better Never ever leave this publication prior to downloading this soft documents of Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better in link that we supply. Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy And How It Can Do Better will truly make a great deal to be your buddy in your lonely. It will be the very best companion to improve your business and hobby.

Product details

#detail-bullets .content {

margin: 0.5em 0px 0em 25px !important;

}

Audible Audiobook

Listening Length: 6 hours and 57 minutes

Program Type: Audiobook

Version: Unabridged

Publisher: Tantor Audio

Audible.com Release Date: February 19, 2019

Whispersync for Voice: Ready

Language: English, English

ASIN: B07N95GDQX

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

This book is extremely well-researched and informative, while at the same time being highly engaging and approachable. Rob Reich channels his years of research and teaching at Stanford, and his real-world experience and involvement with world-changing innovators and philanthropists to bring a unique perspective. It will inspire you and teach you, and be an enjoyable read!

Since I have been contemplating starting a non-profit for some time, this book sparked my interest. Can it be that philanthropy can “undermine democratic values and set back aspirations of justice”? There are many foundations with millions or nearly billions of dollars in their coffers, and yet they have not cured cancer, AIDS and other problems they set out to fix. I have stayed in some awful shelters in a year I spent homeless, and non-profits running these places were clearly not interested in the well being of those who stayed there. And I have also volunteered for many nonprofits across my life, and have found that at all levels, top-to-bottom they are actively interested in doing and spending as little as possible on the issue they are tasked to address, and maximizing the money left over for executive pay, parties or other luxuries of having generous donors. I imagine that if I had the money, I could run a non-profit more efficiently, but what are the hurdles I would face in this ambition? Rob Riech’s (codirector of the Stanford Center of Philanthropy and Civil Society) cover argues that philanthropy at its worst is a “conversion of private assets into public influence. And it is a form of power that is largely unaccountable, often perpetual, and lavishly tax-advantaged. The affluent—and their foundations—reap vast benefits even as they influence policy without accountability… Charity, it turns out, does surprisingly little to provide for those in need and sometimes worsens inequality.” He argues that the solution is in the “decentralization of power in the production of public goods, such as the arts, education, and science.” One such suspect charity example is when the wife of a celebrity is running a charity and the celebrity gives his own money to support this charity tax-free, then the wife takes a large salary out of this money and distributes much of the rest of the incoming funds to friends and family. Thus, the celebrity does not have to pay taxes on a share of the year’s profits because it was filtered through this charity, but the money basically ends up in the same bank account (it might be half lighter, but that half might have gone to friends instead of the IRS). Nonprofits that sell scientific innovations that business owners funding them benefit from is another potential problem. And why do the biggest foundations spend so much money on entertaining potential donors? Why aren’t donors more interested in donating to nonprofits that are conservative in such spending, and do not waste money on entertainment? A glitzy ball and a well-dressed director must sell the notion that a nonprofit has the power to make positive change better than an organization lacking such fineries because it’s pumping every dollar into improving its shelters. These problems are most visible during disaster relief efforts, when the Red Cross and other organizations are paid millions to help, but barely deploy people or resources to do so, keeping the money in New York or Los Angeles or in the executives’ salary accounts. While in my imagination, I wish this was a book that addresses these problems in practical ways, so that we can all move on to creating solutions that will create an equitable and warmhearted world, the reality of what can be achieved in any study is typically sobering. This is primarily a book of political philosophy, so it sets out to discuss government and business policies about giving from a macro perspective. It is broken down into chapters on the types of institutional philanthropy, impact on equality, its political theory, the anti-democratic nature of foundations, and speculations on what philanthropy will look like in the future. Each chapter ends with a “Conclusion” section. In many ways, this book does meet my expectations, for example it expresses concern that Americans are skipping paying taxes on the $390 billion they donate annually to eligible nonprofits (10). A good deal of space is given to how foundations first came about, the meaning of the related words, and why they have become socially acceptable. One major point returned to is the 18/19th century resistance to foundations. But, this is troubling, as their resistance was for reasons like fear of “foreign invasion” and loss of the rights of heirs, or reasons that really might hint at illogical excuses that hid real sentiments that were anti-union, anti-charity and pro rampant capitalism without a social safety net (46). While I’m troubled by the idea of creating anti-charity policies, it is always useful to read well thought-out theories that examine the nature of anything, especially something as impactful as foundations. He also presents plenty of evidence for how foundations’ money is mis-spent, showing how a foundation near Stanford, the Woodside School Foundation raised $7,065 per pupil, while a Los Angeles Unified district foundation gathered a million, but only had enough to spend $2 per pupil (98). He explains that suburban districts’ wealthier parents give more to support poor students in their districts. It is troubling that the conclusion to this chapter begins thus: “A blanket prohibition on private giving to public schools is not necessarily the most justifiable public policy…” (103) This hardly seems to be a productive statement. Prohibiting giving charity to needy schools? Why? Are parents succeeding in paying for their students to receive better grades or otherwise corrupting the system? If the problem is that they’re just giving disproportionally to wealthier districts… is this really a serious problem? Then, there are spots of light again, as in the final conclusion that describes Zuckerbergs’ new “private philanthropic foundation” that was set up as a “for-profit entity, a limited liability company”, thus avoiding “already modest regulatory requirements concerning annual reporting of grant making and prohibitions on political giving… LLCs can engage in charitable grant making, invest in start-up companies, and direct their funds toward political advocacy and electioneering” (199). In other words, this book is difficult to peg. One second, it’s against all foundations, then it’s rallying for them. It’s criticizing corruption, and then sees good in what some foundations are doing. Then again, since the author directs a philanthropy center, it would be strange if it was entirely anti-foundational. It is a digressive and difficult read, but it is focused on delivering mini-points throughout. It is well-written with plenty of supporting evidence, and interesting philosophical discussions. Thus, this book should not be assigned in undergraduate classes, but can best be utilized by policy-makers who want to find out about the different perspectives on this issue. Researchers into foundations will find a broad review of the history of this subject and ideas from its critics and supporters.Pennsylvania Literary Journal: Fall 2018

In short, this book is a great read.On the one hand, it’s a great vehicle for sparking big-picture discussions about such oft-challenging and abstract concepts as justice, fairness, power, and democracy in general. And on the other hand, it explores the real-world issue of philanthropy and related policy which needs to be addressed and, somewhat surprisingly, hasn’t been examined in a rigorous, accessible manner…until now.The writing is clear and well-cited. And it’s a great example, too, of good, rigorous thinking. Even (maybe, even, especially) if you disagree with the argument laid out in this book, it’s well worth examining through this lens and considering what we all might be missing in hopes of creating a more just society.All the while, Reich not just frames the problem but puts forth a solution rooted in policy as a means for allowing and encouraging philanthropy and charitable giving in a way that avoid the injustices he lays out.So, read this book to think about something new; to more deeply consider what it means for a democracy to be truly democratic, and to get a glimpse at how an expert in the field might challenge and enlighten your current ideas on the topic.

A terrific analysis of the democratic costs and opportunities of philanthropy. This book could not come at a better moment, not deliver a more important prescription for "where next". A great read. Highly recommended.

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better PDF
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better EPub
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better Doc
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better iBooks
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better rtf
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better Mobipocket
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better Kindle

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better PDF

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better PDF

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better PDF

Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better PDF